Proposal of a Multilevel Competencies Model for Innovative Public Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2020.v12i2.491Keywords:
Competencies, Innovation, Public sector, Public management, Model, Multilevel analysisAbstract
Considering the relevance of innovation for public organizations and that people are fundamental to generate innovation, there was an absence of the competence models necessary for innovative public management in Brazil, even with recommendations for the development of this type of model by the OECD. The objective was to propose a theoretical model of multilevel analysis of competencies for innovation in the Brazilian public sector. This is a theoretical essay based on the analysis of scientific publications and documentary research on competence and innovation models in the public sector. It was possible to establish premises and conceive a theoretical model of competencies for innovation in the public context, which is dynamic, systemic, multilevel and integrated, in order to allow the identification of the competences necessary to subsidize the competence management subsystems for innovation in the public sector. the improvement in the provision of services. Contributes to the proposal of a model for empirical tests in future studies.
Downloads
References
Aagaard, A. & Andersen, T. (2014). How can HR practices support front-end innovation and increase the innovativeness of companies? European Journal International Management, 8(5), 488-505.
Araújo, G.D., Silva, A.B., & Brandão, J.M.F. (2015). O que revela a literatura internacional sobre os vínculos entre aprendizagem, competências e inovação?, Revista de Administração e Inovação, 12(2), 7-37.
Bartram, D. (2005). The Great Eight Competencies: A Criterion-Centric Approach to Validation, Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1185-1203.
Bloch, C. (2011). Measuring public innovation in the nordic coutries: Copenhagen manual. MEPIN, Copenhagen.
Borrás, S., & Edquist, C. (2015). Education, training and skills in innovation policy, Science and Public Policy, 42, 215–227.
Bos-Nehles, A., Renkema, M., & Janssen, M. (2017). HRM and innovative work behaviour: a systematic literature review. Personnel Review, 46(7), 1228-1253.
Brandão, S.M., & Bruno-Faria, M.F. (2013). Inovação no setor público: análise da produção científica em periódicos nacionais e internacionais da área de administração, Revista de Administração Pública, 47(1), 228-248.
Bysted, R., & Jespersen, J.R. (2013). Comparing public and private sector employees’ innovative behavior, Public Management Review, 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.841977.
Carbone, P.P., Tonet, H.C., Bruno, J.R.S., & Silva, K.I.B. (2016). Gestão por competências. Editora FGV, Rio de Janeiro, RJ.
Chouhan, V.S., & Srivastava, S. (2014). Understanding Competencies and Competency Modeling ― A Literature Survey, Journal of Business and Management, 16(1), 14-22.
Djellal, F., & Gallouj, F. (2005). Mapping innovation dynamics in hospitals, Research Policy, 34, 817-835.
Djellal, F., Gallouj, F., & Miles, I. (2013). Two decades of research on innovation in services: which place for public services? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 27, 98-117.
Dyer, J.H., Gregersen, H.B., & Cristensen, C.M. (2009). The innovator´s DNA, Harvard Business Review, 1-9.
Fedato, G.A.L., Sznitowski, A.M., & Karolczak, M.E. (2018). Prática estratégica nas rotinas da firma inovadora: capacidade de absorver conhecimento para manter a inovação, Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Inovação, 6(1), 1-25.
Ferreira, V.R.S., Tete, M.F., Isidro-Filho, A.S., & Sousa, M.M. (2015). Inovação no setor público federal no brasil na perspectiva da inovação em serviços, Revista de Administração e Inovação, 12(4), 99-118.
Getha-Taylor, H., Blackmar, J., & Borry, E.L. (2016). Are Competencies universal or situational? A state-level investigation of collaborative competencies, Review of public personnel Administration, 36(3), 306-320.
Gökkaya, O., & Özbağ, G.K. (2015). Linking Core Competence, Innovation and Firm Performance, Journal of Business Research Turk, 7(1), 90-102.
Guimarães, T.A. (2000). A nova administração pública e a abordagem da competência, Revista de Administração Pública, 34(3), 125-140.
Hughes, A., Moore, K., & Kataria, N. (2011). Innovation in public sector organizations: a pilot survey for measuring innovation across the public sector. London: NESTA.
Isidro, A. (2018). Gestão Pública Inovadora: um guia para a inovação no setor público. Editora CRV, Curitiba, PR.
Marin-Garcia, J.A., Andreu-Andres, M.A., Atares-Huerta, L., Aznar-Mas, L.E., Garcia-Carbonell, A., González-Ladrón-de-Guevara, F., Montero-Fleta, B., Perez-Peñalver, M.J., & Watts, F. (2016). Proposal of a Framework for Innovation Competencies Development and Assessment (FINCODA), Working Papers on Operations Management, 7(2), 119-126.
Moussa, M., McMurray, A., & Muenjohn, N. (2018). A conceptual framework of the factors influencing innovation in public sector organizations, The Journal of Developing Areas, 52(3), 231-240.
NESTA (2019). Skills, attitudes and behaviours that fuel public innovation: a guide to getting the most from Nesta´s Competency framework for expertimenting and public problem solving. London: NESTA.
OCDE (2015). The Innovation Imperative in the Public Sector: Setting an Agenda for Action, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OCDE (2017a). Core skills for public sector innovation: a beta model of skills to promote and enable innovation in public sector organisations.
OCDE (2017b). Innovar en el sector público: Desarrollando capacidades en Chile, Estudios de la OCDE sobre Gobernanza Pública, Éditions OCDE, Paris.
Podmetina, D., Soderquist, K.E., Petraite, M., & Teplov, R. (2018). Developing a competency model for open innovation: from the individual to the organisational level, Management Decision, 56(6), 1306-1335.
Rahman, Z.N.A., & Ismail, N. (2018). Determinant factors for managing innovation in the Malaysian public sector, MATEC Web Conferences 150, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815005042
Resende Júnior, P.C., Guimarães, T.A., & Bilhim, J.A.F. (2013). Escala de orientação para inovação em organizações públicas: estudo exploratório e confirmatório no Brasil e em Portugal, Revista de Administração e Inovação, 10(1), 257-277.
Ribeiro, J.S.A.N., Soares, A.C., Abranches, P.H.J., & Ziviani, F. (2018). The articulation between innovation and competences anchored by knowledge management aiming sustainnable competitive advantage, Brazilian Journal of Information Science: Research Trends, 12(2), 52-63.
Santos, L.F., Sano, H., & Souza, W.J. (2019). Antecedentes da inovação na gestão pública: análise de experiências inovadoras do setor rural brasileiro, Revista Eletrônica Gestão & Sociedade, 13(35), 2870-2900.
Seeck, H., & Diehl, M.R. (2017). A literature review on HRM and innovation – taking stock and future directions, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(6), 913-944.
Sørensen, E. (2016). Political innovations: innovations in political institutions, processes and outputs, Public Management Review, 1-19. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2016.1200661.
Spinosa, L.M., Schlemm, M.M., & Reis, R. S. (2015). Brazilian innovation ecosystems in perspective: Some challenges for stakeholders, Revista Brasilileira de Estratégia, 8(3), 386-400.
Stefanuto, G.N., Alves, A.M., Salviano, C.F., Mattos, C.V. & Zeitoum, C. (2015). Políticas públicas para inovação em software: uma abordagem via formação de competências, Revista Brasileira de Inovação, 14(esp), 79-202.
Stevens, G.W. (2012). A critical review of the science and practive of competency modeling, Human Resource Development Review, 12(1), 86-107.
Sucupira, Saab, F.G., Demo, G., Bermejo, P.H. (2019) Innovation in public administration: Itineraries of Brazilian scientific production and new research possibilities, Innovation & Management Review, 16(1), 72-90.
Tartari, J., Wilbert, J.K.W., Souza, J.A., & Dandolini, G.A. (2014). Competências individuais para a inovação: em busca do profissional inovador, Revista Espacios, 35(11), 1-11.
Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
Teixeira, J.A., & Rêgo, M.C.B. (2017). Inovação no sistema judiciário com a adoção do processo judicial eletrônico em um Tribunal de Justiça Brasileiro, Revista Ciências Administrativas, 23(3), 369-384.
Ubeda, C.L., & Santos, F.C.A. (2008). Os principais desafios da gestão de competências humanas em um instituto público de pesquisa, Gestão & Produção. 15(1), 189-199.
Valladares, P.S.D.A., Vasconcellos, M.A., & Serio, L.C. (2014). Capacidade de inovação: revisão sistemática da literatura, Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 18(5), 598-626.
Vries, H.A., Tummers, L.G., & Bekkers, V.J.J.M. (2018). The diffusion and adoption of public sector innovations: A meta-synthesis of the literature, Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 1(3), 159-176.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
2. The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
3. The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
4. The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 internacional, which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
6. Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
7. Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
• 8. Authors are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.
