Biotechnological Innovation and Agricultural Adaptation to Climate Change: A Patent-Based Analysis
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Sementes transgênicas
Estresse hídrico
Patentes agrícolas
Aprovação regulatória
Manejo de pragas

How to Cite

Ferrari, V. E., Aparecida de Sousa, G., Ferreira da Silva Filho, C., & Carvalho De Benedicto, S. (2026). Biotechnological Innovation and Agricultural Adaptation to Climate Change: A Patent-Based Analysis. Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies, 18(1), e977. https://doi.org/10.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2026.v18i1.977

Abstract

Purpose: we aim to analyze the role of biotechnological innovation in adapting agriculture to climate change, with emphasis on the development of drought-tolerant cultivars.

Originality: we contribute to literature by integrating patent data and regulatory records, offering a novel approach to assessing technological impact and the degree of commercial adoption of solutions associated with drought tolerance.

Methods: the study adopts a methodology based on the analysis of patents extracted from the Derwent database. Technological impact was measured using bibliometric indicators, complemented by regulatory information on the approval of transgenic seeds.

Results: patent filings accelerate after 2013, with a strong concentration in maize and soybean. Nevertheless, the commercial diffusion of drought-tolerant cultivars remains limited relative to other biotech traits (herbicide tolerance and pest resistance) due to agronomic and economic constraints, notably yield penalties in cropping systems.

Conclusions: the adaptation of agriculture to climate change depends on the consolidation of integrated agricultural systems that combine transgenic seeds, pest management strategies, and supportive public policies. We contribute to a better understanding of the limits and possibilities of biotechnology in addressing climate-related challenges.

https://doi.org/10.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2026.v18i1.977
PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

Brookes, G., & Barfoot, P. (2014). Economic impact of GM crops. GM Crops & Food, 5(1), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.4161/gmcr.28098

Brookes, G., & Barfoot, P. (2020). GM crops: Global socio-economic and environmental impacts 1996–2018. PG Economics Ltd. https://pgeconomics.co.uk/pdf/globalimpactfinalreportJuly2020.pdf

Caleffi, F., Viegas, C., Lima, K., & Bonato, S. (2024). The impacts of extreme weather events: A comprehensive analysis of the 2024 floods in Rio Grande do Sul. Redes – Revista de Desenvolvimento Regional, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.17058/redes.v29i1.19660

Challinor, A. J., Watson, J., Lobell, D. B., Howden, S. M., Smith, D. R., & Chhetri, N. (2014). A meta-analysis of crop yield under climate change and adaptation. Nature Climate Change, 4, 287–291. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2153

Chizzotti, A. (2018). Pesquisa em ciências humanas e sociais. Cortez.

Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11(3), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6

Edmeades, G. O. (2013). Progress in achieving and delivering drought tolerance in maize: An update. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA). https://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/44/specialfeature/Progress%20in%20Achieving%20and%20Delivering%20Drought%20Tolerance%20in%20Maize.pdf

Fernandez-Cornejo, J., & Caswell, M. (2006). The first decade of genetically engineered crops in the United States. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details?pubid=43741

Ferrari, V. E., Silveira, J. M. F. J., & Dal-Poz, M. E. S. (2021). Patent network analysis in agriculture: A case study of the development and protection of biotechnologies. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 30(2), 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2019.1684645

Ferrari, V. E., Moreira, A. M. de A., Branchi, B. A., Benedicto, S. C., & Silva Filho, C. F. (2023). Um estudo sobre o progresso das agendas de promoção da segurança alimentar e do desenvolvimento agrícola. Contribuciones a las Ciencias Sociales, 16(10), 24561–24577. https://doi.org/10.55905/revconv.16n.10-343

Fontana, R., Nuvolari, A., & Verspagen, B. (2009). Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks: An application to data communication standards. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 18(4), 311–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590802564570

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2023). The impact of disasters on agriculture and food security 2023: Avoiding and reducing losses through investment in resilience. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc7900en

Gil, A. C. (2019). Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. Atlas.

Graff, G. D., Hochman, G., & Zilberman, D. (2009). The political economy of agricultural biotechnology policies. AgBioForum, 12(1), 34–46. https://agbioforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/AgBioForum-12-1-34.pdf

Griliches, Z. (1998). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. In National Bureau of Economic Research (Ed.), R&D and productivity: The econometric evidence (pp. 287–343). University of Chicago Press.

Gurian-Sherman, D. (2009). Failure to yield: Evaluating the performance of genetically engineered crops. Union of Concerned Scientists. https://www.ucs.org/sites/default/files/2019-10/failure-to-yield.pdf

Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools (NBER Working Paper No. 8498). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w8498

Harhoff, D., Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. (2003). Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Research Policy, 32(8), 1343–1363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00124-5

Hultgren, A., Carleton, T., Delgado, M., Gergel, D. R., Greenstone, M., Houser, T., Hsiang, S., Jina, A., Kopp, R. E., Malevich, S. B., McCusker, K. E., Mayer, T., Nath, I., Rising, J., Rode, A., & Yuan, J. (2025). Impacts of climate change on global agriculture accounting for adaptation. Nature, 642(8068), 644–652. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09085-w

International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA). (2016). Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2016 (ISAAA Brief No. 52). https://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/52/download/isaaa-brief-52-2016.pdf

International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA). (2018). Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2018: Biotech crops continue to help meet the challenges of increased population and climate change (ISAAA Brief No. 54). https://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/54/download/isaaa-brief-54-2018.pdf

International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA). (2026). GM approval database. Retrieved April 29, 2026, from https://www.isaaa.org/gmapprovaldatabase/

Kekst CNC. (2023). Farmer voice survey 2023. https://www.bayer.com/sites/default/files/FarmerVoiceSurvey2023.pdf

Klümper, W., & Qaim, M. (2014). A meta-analysis of the impacts of genetically modified crops. Plos One, 9(11), e111629. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111629

Lobell, D. B., Schlenker, W., & Costa-Roberts, J. (2011). Climate trends and global crop production since 1980. Science, 333(6042), 616–620. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204531

McFadden, J., Smith, D., Wechsler, S., & Wallander, S. (2019). Development, adoption, and management of drought-tolerant corn in the United States (Economic Information Bulletin No. 204). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. https://ers.usda.gov/sites/default/files/_laserfiche/publications/91103/EIB-204.pdf?v=29559

Oliveira, S. F., Prado, R. B., & Monteiro, J. M. G. (2022). Impactos das mudanças climáticas na produção agrícola e medidas de adaptação sob a percepção de atores e produtores rurais de Nova Friburgo, RJ. Interações, 23(4), 1179–1201. https://doi.org/10.20435/inter.v23i4.3548

Pellegrino, E., Bedini, S., Nuti, M., & Ercoli, L. (2018). Impact of genetically engineered maize on agronomic, environmental and toxicological traits: A meta-analysis of 21 years of field data. Scientific Reports, 8(1), Article 3113. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21284-2

Qaim, M., & de Janvry, A. (2005). Bt cotton and pesticide use in Argentina: Economic and environmental effects. Environment and Development Economics, 10(2), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X04001883

Seixas, R. N. L., Silveira, J. M. F. J., & Ferrari, V. E. (2022). Assessing environmental impact of genetically modified seeds in Brazilian agriculture. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 10, 977793. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.977793

Sosa, G., Fernández-Long, M., & Vicente-Serrano, S. (2025). Evaluating the performance of drought indices for assessing agricultural droughts in Argentina. Agronomy Journal, 117(1), e70008. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70008

Stukenbrock, E., & Gurr, S. (2023). Address the growing urgency of fungal disease in crops. Nature, 617(7959), 31–34. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-01465-4

Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. The RAND Journal of Economics, 21(1), 172–187. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555502

Verspagen, B. (2007). Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks: A study on the history of fuel cell research. Advances in Complex Systems, 10(1), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219525907000945

World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2023). International patent classification (IPC). https://www.wipo.int/classifications/ipc/en/

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.