Biotechnological Innovation and Agricultural Adaptation to Climate Change: A Patent-Based Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2026.v18i1.977Keywords:
Sementes transgênicas, Estresse hídrico, Patentes agrícolas, Aprovação regulatória, Manejo de pragasAbstract
Purpose: we aim to analyze the role of biotechnological innovation in adapting agriculture to climate change, with emphasis on the development of drought-tolerant cultivars.
Originality: we contribute to literature by integrating patent data and regulatory records, offering a novel approach to assessing technological impact and the degree of commercial adoption of solutions associated with drought tolerance.
Methods: the study adopts a methodology based on the analysis of patents extracted from the Derwent database. Technological impact was measured using bibliometric indicators, complemented by regulatory information on the approval of transgenic seeds.
Results: patent filings accelerate after 2013, with a strong concentration in maize and soybean. Nevertheless, the commercial diffusion of drought-tolerant cultivars remains limited relative to other biotech traits (herbicide tolerance and pest resistance) due to agronomic and economic constraints, notably yield penalties in cropping systems.
Conclusions: the adaptation of agriculture to climate change depends on the consolidation of integrated agricultural systems that combine transgenic seeds, pest management strategies, and supportive public policies. We contribute to a better understanding of the limits and possibilities of biotechnology in addressing climate-related challenges.
Downloads
References
Brookes, G., & Barfoot, P. (2014). Economic impact of GM crops. GM Crops & Food, 5(1), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.4161/gmcr.28098 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4161/gmcr.28098
Brookes, G., & Barfoot, P. (2020). GM crops: Global socio-economic and environmental impacts 1996–2018. PG Economics Ltd. https://pgeconomics.co.uk/pdf/globalimpactfinalreportJuly2020.pdf
Caleffi, F., Viegas, C., Lima, K., & Bonato, S. (2024). The impacts of extreme weather events: A comprehensive analysis of the 2024 floods in Rio Grande do Sul. Redes – Revista de Desenvolvimento Regional, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.17058/redes.v29i1.19660 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17058/redes.v29i1.19660
Challinor, A. J., Watson, J., Lobell, D. B., Howden, S. M., Smith, D. R., & Chhetri, N. (2014). A meta-analysis of crop yield under climate change and adaptation. Nature Climate Change, 4, 287–291. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2153
Chizzotti, A. (2018). Pesquisa em ciências humanas e sociais. Cortez.
Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11(3), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6
Edmeades, G. O. (2013). Progress in achieving and delivering drought tolerance in maize: An update. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA). https://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/44/specialfeature/Progress%20in%20Achieving%20and%20Delivering%20Drought%20Tolerance%20in%20Maize.pdf
Fernandez-Cornejo, J., & Caswell, M. (2006). The first decade of genetically engineered crops in the United States. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details?pubid=43741
Ferrari, V. E., Silveira, J. M. F. J., & Dal-Poz, M. E. S. (2021). Patent network analysis in agriculture: A case study of the development and protection of biotechnologies. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 30(2), 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2019.1684645 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2019.1684645
Ferrari, V. E., Moreira, A. M. de A., Branchi, B. A., Benedicto, S. C., & Silva Filho, C. F. (2023). Um estudo sobre o progresso das agendas de promoção da segurança alimentar e do desenvolvimento agrícola. Contribuciones a las Ciencias Sociales, 16(10), 24561–24577. https://doi.org/10.55905/revconv.16n.10-343 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55905/revconv.16n.10-343
Fontana, R., Nuvolari, A., & Verspagen, B. (2009). Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks: An application to data communication standards. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 18(4), 311–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590802564570 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590801969073
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2023). The impact of disasters on agriculture and food security 2023: Avoiding and reducing losses through investment in resilience. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc7900en DOI: https://doi.org/10.4060/cc7900en
Gil, A. C. (2019). Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. Atlas.
Graff, G. D., Hochman, G., & Zilberman, D. (2009). The political economy of agricultural biotechnology policies. AgBioForum, 12(1), 34–46. https://agbioforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/AgBioForum-12-1-34.pdf
Griliches, Z. (1998). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. In National Bureau of Economic Research (Ed.), R&D and productivity: The econometric evidence (pp. 287–343). University of Chicago Press.
Gurian-Sherman, D. (2009). Failure to yield: Evaluating the performance of genetically engineered crops. Union of Concerned Scientists. https://www.ucs.org/sites/default/files/2019-10/failure-to-yield.pdf
Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools (NBER Working Paper No. 8498). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w8498 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w8498
Harhoff, D., Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. (2003). Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Research Policy, 32(8), 1343–1363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00124-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00124-5
Hultgren, A., Carleton, T., Delgado, M., Gergel, D. R., Greenstone, M., Houser, T., Hsiang, S., Jina, A., Kopp, R. E., Malevich, S. B., McCusker, K. E., Mayer, T., Nath, I., Rising, J., Rode, A., & Yuan, J. (2025). Impacts of climate change on global agriculture accounting for adaptation. Nature, 642(8068), 644–652. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09085-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09085-w
International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA). (2016). Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2016 (ISAAA Brief No. 52). https://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/52/download/isaaa-brief-52-2016.pdf
International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA). (2018). Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2018: Biotech crops continue to help meet the challenges of increased population and climate change (ISAAA Brief No. 54). https://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/54/download/isaaa-brief-54-2018.pdf
International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA). (2026). GM approval database. Retrieved April 29, 2026, from https://www.isaaa.org/gmapprovaldatabase/
Kekst CNC. (2023). Farmer voice survey 2023. https://www.bayer.com/sites/default/files/FarmerVoiceSurvey2023.pdf
Klümper, W., & Qaim, M. (2014). A meta-analysis of the impacts of genetically modified crops. Plos One, 9(11), e111629. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111629 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111629
Lobell, D. B., Schlenker, W., & Costa-Roberts, J. (2011). Climate trends and global crop production since 1980. Science, 333(6042), 616–620. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204531 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204531
McFadden, J., Smith, D., Wechsler, S., & Wallander, S. (2019). Development, adoption, and management of drought-tolerant corn in the United States (Economic Information Bulletin No. 204). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. https://ers.usda.gov/sites/default/files/_laserfiche/publications/91103/EIB-204.pdf?v=29559
Oliveira, S. F., Prado, R. B., & Monteiro, J. M. G. (2022). Impactos das mudanças climáticas na produção agrícola e medidas de adaptação sob a percepção de atores e produtores rurais de Nova Friburgo, RJ. Interações, 23(4), 1179–1201. https://doi.org/10.20435/inter.v23i4.3548 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20435/inter.v23i4.3548
Pellegrino, E., Bedini, S., Nuti, M., & Ercoli, L. (2018). Impact of genetically engineered maize on agronomic, environmental and toxicological traits: A meta-analysis of 21 years of field data. Scientific Reports, 8(1), Article 3113. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21284-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21284-2
Qaim, M., & de Janvry, A. (2005). Bt cotton and pesticide use in Argentina: Economic and environmental effects. Environment and Development Economics, 10(2), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X04001883 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X04001883
Seixas, R. N. L., Silveira, J. M. F. J., & Ferrari, V. E. (2022). Assessing environmental impact of genetically modified seeds in Brazilian agriculture. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 10, 977793. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.977793 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.977793
Sosa, G., Fernández-Long, M., & Vicente-Serrano, S. (2025). Evaluating the performance of drought indices for assessing agricultural droughts in Argentina. Agronomy Journal, 117(1), e70008. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.70008
Stukenbrock, E., & Gurr, S. (2023). Address the growing urgency of fungal disease in crops. Nature, 617(7959), 31–34. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-01465-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-01465-4
Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. The RAND Journal of Economics, 21(1), 172–187. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555502 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2555502
Verspagen, B. (2007). Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks: A study on the history of fuel cell research. Advances in Complex Systems, 10(1), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219525907000945 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219525907000945
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). (2023). International patent classification (IPC). https://www.wipo.int/classifications/ipc/en/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
2. The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
3. The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
4. The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Atribuição NãoComercial SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional, which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
6. Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
7. Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
• 8. Authors are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.
• 9 The authors commit to serving as reviewers for the journal: As a form of reciprocity with the academic community, Future Studies reinforces the commitment that authors of accepted articles have to act as reviewers for manuscripts submitted to the journal.
