Stakeholder Management: State of the Art and Perspectives
Keywords:Stakeholder Theory, Organizational relationship, Corporate strategy, Value creation, State of the art.
Purpose – this research aims to present an overview of the stakeholder management, reviewing the main models and theoretical propositions and investigating the phenomena addressed in the empirical papers on the theme.
Design/methodology/approach – A bibliometric survey and sociometric analysis were undertaken considering the international and national publications related to the topic between 1980 and 2019.
Originality / Value: The stakeholder approach has developed in recent years and its application is increasingly present in several areas of management, having a strong dialogue on the emerging issues of society. This study has an academic relevance advancing the dissemination of current knowledge in stakeholder theory integrating to the empirical studies.
Findings – the main results were discussed in order to analyze: the variables related to stakeholder management; the stakeholder management models applied in empirical studies; the main results in studies on stakeholders’ conflict of interest; and discussions about stakeholder influence and pressure.
Research implications – The research contribution consists in the elaboration of a panorama of the stakeholder management, presenting the main theoretical and empirical contributions, and the dimensions for future studies perspectives, being: i) Creation, co-creation and value distribution; ii) cooperation, involvement, and stakeholder engagement; iii) Influence of stakeholder management on performance; and iv) networks, relationships, and multi-stakeholder influences.
Aaltonen, K. & Sivonen, R. (2009) Response strategies to stakeholder pressures in global projects. International Journal of Project Management, 27(2), 131-141.
Ackermann, F. & Eden, C. (2011). Strategic Management of Stakeholders: Theory and Practice. Long Range Planning, 44(3), 179-196.
Araújo, C. A. (2006). Bibliometria: evolução histórica e questões atuais. Em Questão, 12(1) 11-32.
Asel, J., Posch, A. & Speckbacher, G. (2011). Squeezing or cuddling? The impact of economic crises on management control and stakeholder management. Review of Managerial Science, 5(2-3) 213-231.
Barakat, S., Mascena, K. M. C. D., Sarturi, G., & Takenouchi, P. (2019). Recursos intangíveis e a relação entre desempenho social e desempenho financeiro em empresas brasileiras. Contextus – Revista Contemporânea de Economia e Gestão, 17(3), 40-65.
Bardin, L. (1977). Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: Ed.70.
Barnett, M. L. (2014). Why stakeholders ignore firm misconduct: A cognitive view. Journal of Management, 40(3), 676-702.
Barney, J. B., & Harrison, J. S. (2020). Stakeholder Theory at the Crossroads. Business & Society, 59(2), 203–212.
Bartkus, B. R. & Glassman, M. (2008). Do Firms Practice What They Preach? The Relationship Between Mission Statements and Stakeholder Management. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2) 207-216.
Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S. & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5) 488-506.
Boaventura, J. M. G.; Fontes, L. G. P.; Sarturi, G.; Armando, E. (2017). Critérios para Identificação da Saliência de Stakeholders através da Análise de Conteúdo. Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies, 9(2), 3-28.
Boaventura, J. M. G., Bosse, D. A., Mascena, K. M. C., & Sarturi, G. (2020). Value distribution to stakeholders: The influence of stakeholder power and strategic importance in public firms. Long Range Planning, 53(2), 1-18.
Boerner, S. & Jobst, J. (2011). Stakeholder Management and Program Planning in German Public Theaters. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 22(1), 67-84.
Bosse, D. A.; Coughlan, R. (2016). Stakeholder relationship bonds. Journal of Management Studies, 53(7), 1197-1222.
Bridoux, F., & Stoelhorst, J. W. (2016). Stakeholder relationships and social welfare: A behavioral theory of contributions to joint value creation. Academy of Management Review, 41(2), 229-251.
Bridoux, F. M., & Vishwanathan, P. (2020). When do powerful stakeholders give managers the latitude to balance all stakeholders’ interests?. Business & Society, 59(2), 232-262.
Choi, J. & Wang, H. (2009). Stakeholder Relations and the Persistence of Corporate Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(8), 895-907.
Civera, C., & Freeman, R. E. (2019). Stakeholder Relationships and Responsibilities: A New Perspective. Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, (1), 40-58.
Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117.
Co, H. C. & Barro, F. (2009). Stakeholder theory and dynamics in supply chain collaboration. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29(6), 591-611.
Coombs, J. E. & Gilley, K. M. (2005). Stakeholder Management as a Predictor of CEO Compensation: Main Effects and Interactions with Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(9), 827-840.
Crane, B. (2020). Revisiting who, when, and why stakeholders matter: Trust and stakeholder connectedness. Business & Society, 59(2), 263-286.
Donaldson, T. & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
Elias, A. A., Cavana, R. Y. & Jackson, L. S. (2002). Stakeholder analysis for R&D project management. R&D Management, 32(4), 301-310.
Fassin, Y. A. (2010). Dynamic Perspective in Freeman’s Stakeholder Model. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(SI), 39-49.
Fong, E. A. (2010). CEO pay fairness as a predictor of stakeholder management. Journal of Business Research, 63(4), 404-410.
Freeman, R. E.; Harrison, J. S. & Wicks, A. C. (2007). Managing for Stakeholders: Survival, Reputation, and Success. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press.
Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Freeman, R. E. (2017). The new story of business: Towards a more responsible capitalism. Business and Society Review, 122(3), 449-465.
Freeman, R. E., Phillips, R., & Sisodia, R. (2020). Tensions in stakeholder theory. Business & Society, 59(2), 213-231.
Friedman, A. L. & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders: Theory and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder Influence Strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191-205.
Garcia‐Castro, R., & Aguilera, R. V. (2015). Incremental value creation and appropriation in a world with multiple stakeholders. Strategic Management Journal, 36(1), 137-147.
Hair Jr, J. F., Babin, B., Money, A. H. & Samouel, P. (2005). Fundamentos de métodos de pesquisa em administração. Porto Alegre: Bookman.
Harrison, J. S., Bosse, D. A., & Phillips, R. A. (2010). Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic management journal, 31(1), 58-74.
Harrison, J. S., Freeman, R. E., & Abreu, M. C. S. D. (2015). Stakeholder theory as an ethical approach to effective management: Applying the theory to multiple contexts. Revista brasileira de gestão de negócios, 17(55), 858-869.
Harrison, J. S., Phillips, R. A., & Freeman, R. E. (2019). On the 2019 Business Roundtable “Statement on the Purpose of a Corporation”. Journal of Management, (in-press).
Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2013). Stakeholder theory, value, and firm performance. Business ethics quarterly, 23(1), 97-124.
Hersel, M. C., Helmuth, C. A., Zorn, M. L., Shropshire, C., & Ridge, J. W. (2019). The corrective actions organizations pursue following misconduct: A review and research agenda. Academy of Management Annals, 13(2), 547-585.
Hillman, A. J. & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125-139.
Holtbrügge, D., Berg, N. & Puck, J. F. (2007). To bribe or to convince? Political stakeholders and political activities in German multinational corporations. International Business Review, 16(1), 47-67.
Humphrey, J., Todeva, E., Armando, E., & Giglio, E. (2019). Global Value Chains, Business Networks, Strategy and International Business: The Convergence. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 21(SI), 607-627.
Ishii, K., Ichimura, T., Kondoh, S. & Hiraki, S. (2009). An innovative management system to create new values. International Journal of Technology Management, 45(3-4), 291-305.
Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404-437.
Jones, T. M., Harrison, J. S., & Felps, W. (2018). How applying instrumental stakeholder theory can provide sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 43(3), 371-391.
Jones, T. M. & Wicks, A. C. (1999). Convergent Stakeholder Theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 206-221.
Jones, T. M., Wicks, A. C., & Freeman, R. E. (2017). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. The Blackwell guide to business ethics, 17-37.
Lopes, L. & Mañas, A. V. (2013). Atrasos em projetos de TI causados por falhas na gestão dos stakeholders. Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies, 5(2), 155-155.
Mascena, K. M. C. D., Fischmann, A. A., & Boaventura, J. M. G. (2018). Stakeholder Prioritization in Brazilian Companies Disclosing GRI Reports. BBR. Brazilian Business Review, 15(1), 17-32.
Melo, M., Souza, R., & Yaryd, R. (2018). The Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and the Knowledge Transfer as Sources for Shared Value Generation. Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies, 10(3), 402-426.
Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R. & Wood, D.J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886,.
Morris, S. A. (1997). Internal Effects of Stakeholder Management Devices. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(4), 413-424.
Ogden, S.& Watson, R. (1999). Corporate performance and stakeholder management: Balancing shareholder and customer interests in the U.K. privatized water industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 526-538.
Parent, M. M. & Deephouse, D. L. (2007). A Case Study of Stakeholder Identification and Prioritization by Managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(1), 1-23.
Pereira, A. A., Stocker, F., Mascena, K. M. C. D., Boaventura, J. M. G. (2020). Desempenho Social e Financeiro em empresas brasileiras: análise da influência do disclosure. BBR. Brazilian Business Review, (in-press).
Plaza-Úbeda, J. A., Burgos-Jiménez, J. & Carmona-Moreno, E. (2010). Measuring Stakeholder Integration: Knowledge , Interaction and Adaptational Behavior Dimensions. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(3), 419-442.
Priem, R. L., Krause, R., Tantalo, C., & McFadyen, A. (2019). Promoting Long-Term Shareholder Value by “Competing” for Essential Stakeholders: A New, Multi-Sided Market Logic for Top Managers. Academy of Management Perspectives, (in-press).
Post, J. E., Preston, L. E. & Sachs, S. (2002). Managing the Extended Enterprise: The New Stakeholder View. California Management Review, 45(1), 6-28.
Reynolds, S. J., Schultz, F. C. & Hekman, D. R. (2006). Stakeholder Theory and Managerial Decision-Making: Constraints and Implications of Balancing Stakeholder Interests. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(3), 285-301.
Rowley, T. I. (1997). Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887-910.
Rowley, T. J. (2017). The Power of and in Stakeholder Networks. In Stakeholder Management. Emerald Publishing Limited, 101-122.
Rowley, T. I. & Moldoveanu, M. (2003). When Will Stakeholder Groups Act? An Interest - And Identity - Based Model of Stakeholder Group Mobilization. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 204-219.
Sarturi, G., Barakat, S. R., de Mascena, K. M. C., & Fischmann, A. A. (2016). Fairness ou Arms-lenght: Abordagens da Gestão de Stakeholders no Setor Bancário. Organizações e Sustentabilidade, 4(2), 3-29.
Sarturi, G., Mascena, K. M. C., Boaventura, J. M. G., & Pilli, L. E. (2018). Relação entre Saliência de Stakeholders e Desempenho Financeiro. Revista Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança, 21(2), 214-230.
Sarturi, G., Seravalli, C., & Boaventura, J. M. G. (2015). Afinal, o que é distribuir valor para os stakeholders? Uma análise bibliográfica sobre o tema. Revista de Administração da UFSM, (8), 92-113.
Stocker, F., Arruda, M. P., Mascena, K. M. C., Boaventura, J.M.G. (2020). Stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting: a classification model. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 1–10.
Stocker, F., Carvalho, A. M., Gomes, M. P., Pascoal, M. S., de Sousa, R. F., & Alves, S. A. S. (2019). Distribuição de Valor para Stakeholders em Empresas de Economia Compartilhada. Brazilian Journal of Development, 5(10), 20002-20019.
Stocker, F., Mascena, K., Azevedo, A., & Boaventura, J. (2019). Teoria de Redes de Influências de Stakeholders: uma abordagem revisitada. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 17(SI), 673-688
Stocker, F., & de Mascena, K. M. C. (2019). Orientação e gestão para stakeholders no processo de decisão organizacional. Revista de Gestão e Secretariado, 10(1), 167-191.
Strong, K. C., Ringer, R. C. & Taylor, S. A. (2001). The Rules of Stakeholder Satisfaction (Timeliness, Honesty, Empathy). Journal of Business Ethics, 32(3), 219-230.
Schneider, T.; Sachs, S. (2017). The impact of stakeholder identities on value creation in issue-based stakeholder networks. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(1), 41-57.
Sulkowski, A. J., Edwards, M., & Freeman, R. E. (2018). Shake Your Stakeholder: Firms Leading Engagement to Cocreate Sustainable Value. Organization & Environment, 31(3), 223-241.
Tantalo, C.; Priem, R. L. (2016). Value creation through stakeholder synergy. Strategic Management Journal, 37(2), 314-329.
Wolfe, R. A. & Putler, D. S. (2002). How Tight Are the Ties that Bind Stakeholder Groups? Organization Science, 13(1), 64-80.
Wood, D. J., Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Bryan, L. M. (2018). Stakeholder Identification and Salience After 20 Years: Progress, Problems, and Prospects. Business & Society, 1-50.
Yang, J., Shen, G. Q., Ho, M., Drew, D. S. & Xue, X. (2011). Stakeholder management in construction: An empirical study to address research gaps in previous studies. International Journal of Project Management, 29(7), 900-910.
Zollo, M., Minoja, M., & Coda, V. (2018). Toward an integrated theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 39(6), 1753-1778.
How to Cite
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms: the author(s) authorize(s) the publication of the text in the journal;
2. The author(s) ensure(s) that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of evaluation by another journal;
3. The journal is not responsible for the views, ideas and concepts presented in articles, and these are the sole responsibility of the author(s);
4. The publishers reserve the right to make textual adjustments and adapt texts to meet with publication standards.
5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Atribuição NãoComercial 4.0 internacional, which allows the work to be shared with recognized authorship and initial publication in this journal.
6. Authors are allowed to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
7. Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on a personal web page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate positive effects, as well as increase the impact and citations of the published work (see the effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html• 8. Authors are able to use ORCID is a system of identification for authors. An ORCID identifier is unique to an individual and acts as a persistent digital identifier to ensure that authors (particularly those with relatively common names) can be distinguished and their work properly attributed.