Innovation Diligence – A Case Study of a Methodology for Technology Evaluation in the Technology Transfer Offices from Brazil

Artur Tavares Vilas Boas Ribeiro, Elimar Pires Vasconcellos

Abstract


The Technology Innovation Agencies in Brazil are a recent phenomenon still in the maturing process. Inspired by the Technology Transfer/Licensing Offices, they have the challenge to encourage the diffusion of knowledge from universities and research centers in order to promote innovation and economic development. For many reasons, the context of the Brazilian Agencies is characterized by the absence of support and the scarcity of human resources, with small teams and a small institutional structure to fulfill their mission. Therefore, the process of technology transfer and fostering innovation becomes harder than usual, and no much expertise about how can these Agencies tackle the challenges for innovation. The article presents a methodology to support the process of technology transfer in the Brazilian context. The research is based on a case study and the data was collected through interviews and internal documents of an organization that has been working in partnership with these agencies in several regions of Brazil. The results stand out for the novelty of proposing a formalized process to evaluate technologies for transference in contexts of low resources. In addition, the article presents good practices and specific challenges in the final discussions. The main goal is to support the agencies and to improve the study of mechanisms for the technology transfer process.


Keywords


Technology licensing offices; Technology transfer; Technology management; Academic entrepreneurship; Universities

References


Avidor, J. (2011) Building an Innovation Economy: Public Policy Lessons from Israel. Northwestern Law and Economics Research Paper, (11-18).

Bozeman, B. (2000) Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29, 627–655.

Brasil, (2004). Lei 10.973 de 2 de dezembro de 2004. Dispõe sobre incentivos à inovação e à pesquisa científica e tecnológica no ambiente produtivo e dá outras providências. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2004-2006/2004/lei/l10.973.htm. Acesso em 17/07/2017.

Brasil, (2016). Lei 13.243, de 11 de janeiro de 2016. Dispõe sobre estímulos ao desenvolvimento científico, à pesquisa, à capacitação científica e tecnológica e à inovação e altera a Lei no 10.973, de 2 de dezembro de 2004, a Lei no 6.815, de 19 de agosto de 1980, a Lei no 8.666, de 21 de junho de 1993, a Lei no 12.462, de 4 de agosto de 2011, a Lei no 8.745, de 9 de dezembro de 1993, a Lei no 8.958, de 20 de dezembro de 1994, a Lei no 8.010, de 29 de março de 1990, a Lei no 8.032, de 12 de abril de 1990, e a Lei no 12.772, de 28 de dezembro de 2012, nos termos da Emenda Constitucional no 85, de 26 de fevereiro de 2015. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2015-2018/2016/Lei/L13243.htm. Acesso em 17/07/2017.

Day, G. S.; Schoemaker, P. J. H.; Gunther, R. E. (2003) Gestão de Tecnologias Emergentes - a visão da Wharton School.

UK Design Council. (2014) Innovation by design: how design enables science and technology research to achieve greater impact. Technopolis Group.

Dias, A. A., & Porto, G. S. (2014). Como a USP transfere tecnologia?. Organizações & Sociedade, 21(70), 489-507.

Doering, D. S., & Parayre, R. (2000). Identification and assessment of emerging technologies. Wharton on Managing emerging technologies, GS Day, PJH Schoemaker and RE Gunther, Eds. John Wiley and Sons Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 75.

Isenberg, Daniel. (2010) How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution. Harvard Business Review.

Israel. (2015) Israel Trade and Economic Office, Embassy of Israel - Geneva, Switzerland. Israeli Ministry of Economy and Industry - Foreign Trade Administration. Disponível em: http://itrade.gov.il/switzerland/ittn-2015-3rd-conference-of-the-israel-tech-transfer-organization/ Acesso em: 16/07/2017.

Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review. Vol 24 (4), 691-710.

Livesey, F. (2014). Report on survey of Brazilian Technology Transfer Offices (TTOs). University of Cambridge Enterprise.

Mankins, J. C. (1995). Technology readiness levels. White Paper, April, 6.

Rogers, E.; Yin, J.; Hoffmann, J. (2000). Assessing the Effectiveness of Technology Transfer Offices at U.S. Research Universities. Department of Communication and Journalism, University of New Mexico.

Porter, A. L., Cunningham, S. W., Banks, J., Roper, A. T., Mason, T. W., & Rossini, F. A. (2011). Forecasting and Management of Technology. John Wiley & Sons.

Schwab, K. (2016). The Global Competitiviness Report. World Economic Forum.

Secundo, G.; De Beer, C.; Passiante, G. (2016). Measuring university technology transfer efficiency: a maturity level approach. Measuring Business Excellence. Vol. 20 (3) pp. 4.

Willcox, L. C. B. (2004). Avaliação do desenvolvimento tecnológico e transferência de tecnologia: o caso Instituto Oswaldo Cruz – Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 9(2):389-398.

Yin, R. K. (2005). Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2019.v11i2.358

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM




Copyright (c) 2019 Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Future Stud. Res. J. e-ISSN: 2175-5825

Mailing Address: Avenida Drª Ruth Cardoso, 7221 - CEP 05425-070 - Pinheiros - São Paulo/SP - Brasil

Licença Creative Commons
Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.